Prioritizing and selecting a research topic
Prioritizing and selecting a research topic
Why do we prioritize public health problems?
1. Limited resources.
2. Not enough people.
3. Not enough time.
4. Not enough money.
Criteria for selecting a
research topic:
Relevance:
The topic you choose
should be a priority problem. Questions to be asked include: How large or
widespread is the problem? Who is affected? How severe is the problem?
q How large or
widespread is the problem?
q Who is
affected?
q How severe is
the problem?
Avoidance of
duplication: Before you decide to carry out a study, it is important that
you find out whether the suggested topic has been investigated before, either
within the proposed study area or in another area with similar conditions. If
the topic has been researched, the results should be reviewed to explore
whether major questions that deserve further investigation remain unanswered.
If not, another topic should be chosen.
Urgency of data needed (timeliness):
Are data urgently
needed for decision-making or developing interventions at various levels (from
community to policy)?
Political acceptability
of study: Is the topic acceptable to high level policymakers? Or has
the topic been the interest and support of the local/national authorities?
Feasibility of study:
Look at the project
you are proposing and consider the complexity of the problem and the resources
you will require carrying out your study. Thought should be given first to
manpower, time, equipment and money that are locally available.
Applicability of results:
Is it likely that
the recommendations from the study will be applied?
Ethical acceptability:
We should always
consider the possibility that we may inflict harm on others while carrying out
research.
• Therefore,
review the study you are proposing and consider important ethical issues
such as:
• How acceptable
is the research to those who will be studied?
• Can informed
consent be obtained from the research subjects?
· Confidentiality
of data collected
Scales for rating research topics
Relevance
1 = Not relevant
2 = Relevant
3 = very relevant
Avoidance of duplication
1 = Sufficient information already available
2 = Some information available but major
issues not covered
3 = No sound information available on which
to base problem-solving
1 = Study not feasible considering
available resources
2 = Study feasible considering
available resources
3 = Study very feasible
considering available resources
Political acceptability
1 = Topic not acceptable
2 = Topic somewhat acceptable
3 = Topic fully acceptable
Applicability
1 = No chance of recommendations being implemented
2 = Some chance of recommendations being implemented
3 = Good chance of
recommendations being implemented
Urgency
1 = Information not urgently
needed
2 = Information could be used but a delay
of some months would be acceptable
3 = Data very urgently needed for
decision-making
Ethical acceptability
1 = Major ethical problems
2 = Minor
ethical problems
3 = No
ethical problems
Comments
Post a Comment